- How many display port does a macbook g4 have full#
- How many display port does a macbook g4 have pro#
- How many display port does a macbook g4 have plus#
- How many display port does a macbook g4 have mac#
Apple markets an adapter that can provide a full-size USB connector, and a "Digital AV Multiport Adapter" with a charging pass-through, full-size USB port, and HDMI output. The port supports transmission speeds of up to 5 Gbit/s, and can be used for data, and audio/video output, and charging it was the first MacBook without MagSafe charging.
How many display port does a macbook g4 have mac#
The re-driver works with Thunderbolt and USB4 signals, and is thus compatible with both Thunderbolt 3 and Thunderbolt 4.The MacBook has only two ports, a 3.5 mm headphone jack and a single, multi-purpose USB-C port it was the first Mac with USB-C. The Thunderbolt controller is on the SoC. The M1 Macs have two Thunderbolt re-drivers because they have two Thunderbolt ports. If multiple displays are important to you, perhaps an M1 Mac is not the right product choice for you.
It can drive five displays, including the built-in display).
How many display port does a macbook g4 have pro#
My 2017 MacBook Pro has four Thunderbolt ports, two Thunderbolt controllers, and a discrete graphics card. A trash can Mac Pro has dual video cards and two Thunderbolt controllers, so it can support 4 displays. There’s nothing “intentionally crippled” about this. For M1 machines, one DP stream goes to the built in display (laptop) or the HDMI connector (Mac Mini).
How many display port does a macbook g4 have plus#
For previous Intel based Apple laptops, that meant the built-in display, plus up to two more via Thunderbolt. Intel integrated graphics van drive three. Thunderbolt 4 also supports two Display Port stream inputs at the controller, and mandates that both are connected. Not all implementations connect two streams to the controller. Thunderbolt 3 supports two Display Port streams. Sorry?īecause the retimers are the only requirement for compatibility?Įither you work at Apple and know all about the architecture and the machine's capabilities, and view your employers decision as a slight against the end user, or you read an article about a single hardware component and are now an armchair hardware engineer. Because I'm not inherently seeing Apple letting me down personally as indication that Apple is the devil. or I'm against anyone that wants 2+ monitors. Then how come they got two Intel TB4 retimer for? Each retimer supports DP 1.4.Īnd that has what to do with the GPU capabilities? I said, it's not your decision to make and there are quite a lot of people are using multiple monitors and previous Intel Macs supported WITHOUT any problems. Maybe the hardware even differs in capabilities. It's almost like they're running different chips internally.
How many display port does a macbook g4 have full#
Why dont you check both 2020 MBA and MBP's spec and how many monitors they support?Īnd here we come full circle. Crazy talk, I know.Ĭlearly, you do not understand the point here.Ĭlearly. Almost like the standard that Intel has spearheaded isn't totally compatible with M1 chips. Yeah, almost like they're not using the same chips. Simply Intel Mac supported without any problems while M1 does not. You are nothing but justify Apple's stupid decision like iPhone 12 without a power adapter. No, I'm saying forcing a user to think about what monitors are active is not user friendly.
For a while.Īnd yet, you are saying less monitor is user friendly which is completely BS. Well, I wouldn't say I don't care about users that have multiple monitors.įor what it's worth, I have in the past. Maybe the hardware even differs in capabilities.Īre you seriously not caring about those users using multiple monitors like me? There's merits to both sides of that argument.īecause Intel Mac supported which is quite obvious. But what you and I may consider "crippling the device," Apple may consider streamlining the experience. Is it what I would have chosen? Maybe not. This doesn't have to be something sinister. So perhaps Apple removed that option so there's less chance of confusion. Sure, it might be possible with the M1 to drive two Thunderbolt screens and NOT the internal / HDMI screen. Making the user think about which screens are running and how many screens can run is the opposite of that. So even if Apple disabled that option, it isn't inherently malicious.Īpple has always prided itself on being user-friendly. Plug in two display adapters to an M1, be it the MacBook Pro / Air with an internal display (that makes three) or the Mac mini (HDMI makes three) and it is a bad user experience. It isn't user-friendly to allow the M1 devices to support two arbitrary screens, and not three. What reason is there to believe that this is a fake limitation? Even if the supporting hardware can support the extra screens, that doesn't mean the M1 can. You're assuming the M1 can support three screens simultaneously.
0 kommentar(er)
